Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition before the High Court at Patna, claiming a compromise had taken place between the parties.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10914 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2005 Thana- FATUHA District- Patna
====================================================== Ramchandra Mahto Son of Dashrath Mahto Resident of Village-Usfa , PS Fatuha, District Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kuber Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Meena Singh(App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA
ORAL ORDER
2 19-09-2018 This matter has been listed under the heading ‘To Be
Mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that compromise has already taken place between the parties. He, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Accordingly, this Cr. Misc. petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
shyambihari/-
U T
Ramchandra Mahto
The State of Bihar
Shanti Devi
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
