Allowed

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Sept 2018CR. MISC./48126/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna allowed a bail application filed by Pawan Yadav and Binod Yadav. They were accused under Sections 25, 26, and 35 of the Arms Act regarding recovery of country-made pistols. The court granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of like amount.

Pawan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48126 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2018 Thana -BAKHTIARPUR District- SAHARSA

¶4

====================================================== 1. Pawan Yadav, Son of Vilo Yadav, 2. Binod Yadav, Son of Siyaram Yadav, Both residents of Village- Sonpura Goriya Tola (O.P. Bawahat), P.S.- Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Bakhtiarpur (Balwa Hat O.P.) P.S.Case No. 80 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

¶12

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol from the possession of petitioner No. 1 and one country made pistol and cartridge from the possession of the petitioner No. 2.

¶13

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have been falsely implicated in this case rather the recovery of arms from the house of one Bhikhan Sah and the petitioners have been roped in this case due to ulterior

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48126 of 2018 (2) dt.27-09-2018

¶15

2/2

¶16

motive and they are in custody since 06.03.2018 and charge sheet

¶17

has already been submitted against the petitioners.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P also.

¶19

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa Bakhtiarpur (Balwa Hat O.P.) P.S.Case No. 80 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person, having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

¶21

ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶22

iii) It is made clear that if petitioners found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶23

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

Sudha/-

¶25

U T

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Samshul Hoda Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lakhindra Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar