Allowed

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2018CR. MISC./46200/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted bail to Raju Kumar in a P.S. case involving kidnapping and dishonour. Relying on the victim's statement revealing a love affair and the petitioner's lack of antecedents and willingness to cooperate, the court allowed release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, in the Sasaram (Agrer) P.S. Case No. 612 of 2018.

Raju Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46200 of 2018 (2) dt.27-08-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46200 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -612 Year- 2018 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)

¶4

====================================================== Raju Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Yadav, R/o Vill.- Khudhunu, P.S.- Sasaram (Agrer, Distt.- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶7

2 27-08-2018

¶8

The petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2018 in connection with Sasaram (Agrer) P.S. Case No. 612 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 366(A), 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though it has been stated in the first information report that the petitioner had kidnapped the victim girl, namely, Maya Kumari, aged about 17 years, the victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated that her age is 19 years and has also stated that she had not been kidnapped and she was having a love affair with the petitioner and they had together eloped and got married at Ludhiana. It is further submitted that the petitioner is willing to co-operate in any further investigation and also in the trial which may ensue.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46200 of 2018 (2) dt.27-08-2018

¶11

Considering the statement of the victim girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the statement of the petitioner that he shall cooperate in any further investigation and also because the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Sasaram (Agrer) P.S. Case No. 612 of 2018.

¶12

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶13

Jagdish/-

¶14

U T

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manjeet Kumar Rai @ Manjeet Kumar @ Manjeet Kum @ Manjeet Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Laldhari Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.