Allowed

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2018CR. MISC./45970/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge Bench granted bail to the petitioner charged under the Arms Act, allowing his release on a bond with two sureties despite his criminal antecedents, subject to specific conditions regarding court attendance and investigation cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount, subject to four specific conditions.

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45970 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2018 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh, S/o Bhushan Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Bihat (Gurdashpur Tola), P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 24-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶9

The petitioner is in custody since 18.02.2018 in connection with Barauni (FCI) P.S. Case No.55 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that actually, there was no recovery from the petitioner, but seizure list was prepared without following the provisions of law and the petitioner was made to sign on blank piece of paper, which was subsequently converted into a seizure list and the recovery of a country-made pistol and two cartridges has been attributed.

¶11

Considering the aforementioned submissions as

¶12

advanced by the petitioner and also the petitioner is having

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45970 of 2018 (2) dt.24-08-2018

¶14

2/2

¶15

criminal antecedents, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (FCI) P.S. Case No.55 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:

¶16

(1) One of the bailors will be his father.

¶17

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶18

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶19

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶21

PNM U T

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mohit Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar @ Dindolia Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manjeet Kumar Rai @ Manjeet Kumar @ Manjeet Kum @ Manjeet Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Sewak Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.