Allowed

Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2018CR. MISC./45377/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge oral order granting bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving alleged misappropriation of government funds via fraudulent transfer of mobile money orders despite the offense being serious under IPC. Court noted full restitution and granted bail on low bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45377 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2017 Thana -BALIGAON District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/o Devendra Prasad Singh, R/o Branch Post Master (Put Off Duty), Vill.- Alinagar, Leodhan, P.S.- Baligaun, District- Vaishali. (At presednt R/o Vill.- Bariyarpur @ Karpur, P.S.- Piar, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶6

The petitioner has been in custody since 04.06.2018 in connection with Baligaun P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420/409/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the allegation against the petitioner is of misappropriation of a sum of Rs. 1593689/- of Government Revenue by fraudulently transferring the same by means of 172 mobile money orders, no sooner the petitioner realized that the sum had been transferred to wrong accounts, the petitioner immediately deposited the total misappropriated amount as aforementioned in the government

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45377 of 2018 (2) dt.09-08-2018

¶9

2/2

¶10

accounts on different dates.

¶11

It is thus, submitted that there was no intention of misappropriation and whatsoever, mistake has been committed by him has already been rectified. Under such circumstances, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail.

¶12

Considering the nature of allegation and the money has already been returned which is evident from the First Information Report itself, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-XII, Hajipur, in connection with Baligaun P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017.

¶13

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶14

Saif/-

¶15

U T

Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kumar Gaurav @ Vote Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujeet Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivjee Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu @ Kallu @ Ram Shankar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar