Allowed

Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2018CR. MISC./45876/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioners, who were in custody in a public order case under various IPC sections. The court considered the presence of a counter-case and injuries on both sides as well as the nature of the dispute. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond with sureties to the local Chief Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Application for bail allowed. Petitioners released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran.

Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45876 of 2018

¶2

====================================================== 1. Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav, S/o Late Bujhawan Rai.

¶3

Namit Yadav, S/o Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav,

¶4

Both resident of Village- Bankat, P.S.- Muffasil Motihari, District- East Champaran

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP

¶7

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 08-08-2018

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶10

The petitioners are in custody since 26.05.2018 in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.282 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 307, 447, 448, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case with injuries having been inflicted on both sides. It is further submitted that the injuries purported to have been caused are not by the present two petitioners and the only allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he snatched some money whereas with regard to petitioner

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45876 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018

¶13

2/2

¶14

no.2, it has been alleged that he had a country-made pistol and

¶15

was threatening the informant’s side.

¶16

Considering the aforementioned facts and

¶17

circumstances and the nature of dispute between the parties and that there is only one case against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.282 of 2018.

¶18

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶19

PNM

¶20

U T

Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Teras Rai @ Teras Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Manjesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kumar Gaurav @ Vote Babu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujeet Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

M/s Sita Flour Mills p Limited Through Its Director, Pawan Kumar Vs The Bihar State Electricity Board Through Its Chairman and Anr.