Allowed

Shravan Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC21 Jun 2018CR. MISC./35618/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Kumar allowed bail to the two petitioners in a criminal case involving offences under sections 354A, 354D, 506, 509/34 IPC and 67(a) IT Act, noting estranged relationship and pending divorce proceedings between the petitioner and the informant.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Shravan Kumar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35618 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shravan Kumar, S/o Sitaram Bhagat, R/o village- Mahadeo Baran, Mirjachowki, P.S.+P.O. Mirjachowki, District- Sahebganj (Jharkhand) 2. Sitaram Bhagat, S/o Late Raghunath Bhagat, R/o village- Mahgama, P.S.Mahgama, District- Godda.

¶5

... ... Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Bihar

¶8

Preeti Kumari, W/o Shravan Kumar, D/o Jai Prakash Jaiswal, R/o village+P.O. Mathurapur, P.S. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Shashi Shekhar Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-06-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bhagalpur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2017 registered under Sections 354A, 354D, 506, 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code & 67(a) Information Technology Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the husband of the informant. There is estranged relationship between the two as she earlier filed the case under Section 498(A) and in that case he was granted anticipatory bail. The petitioner no. 1 filed a divorce case and in that case the informant is also contesting the case. So, this false accusation

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35618 of 2018(2) dt.21-06-2018 2/2

¶17

made against the petitioners and they are in custody for more than four months.

¶18

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners, namely, Shravan Kumar & Sitaram Bhagat, are directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Bhagalpur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2017.

¶19

Khushbu/Archana-

Shravan Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shravan Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaishar Ali @ Munmun Vs The State Of Bihar

Lola Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Fagu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Maraiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Rahmat Quraishi @ Rahmat Quraishi @ Md. Rahmat Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sahil @ Md. Sohail Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.