Allowed

Manish Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 May 2018CR. MISC./32135/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners in a criminal case involving charges under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 385, 386, 393 and 504 of the IPC. The bail was ordered for a period of four weeks subject to furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directed release on anticipatory bail within four weeks upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M–cum–Sub Judge.

Manish Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32135 of 2018 (2) dt.23-05-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32135 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2018 Thana -MARANCHI District- PATNA

¶4

====================================================== 1. Manish Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh Son of Naval Kishore Singh 2. Naval Kishore Singh Son of late Harkeshwari Singh 3. Gaurav Kumar Son of Rajesh Kumar @ Tittu Singh

¶5

Vipuk Kumar Son of Parmanand Singh All are Resident of VillagePachmahla, Police Station- Maranchi, (Pachmahla O.P.), District- Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 23-05-2018

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶10

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Maranchi P.S. Case No. 22 of 2018 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections- 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 385, 386, 393 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Allegation against the petitioners is that they got forcibly release co-accused Rajesh Kumar who was in drunken condition.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation itself is absurd and it is impossible to get release any person from the custody of armed police personnel, without causing injury to any police personnel and all petitioners are family members of coaccused Rajesh Kumar, have been made accused and all have clean antecedent.

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32135 of 2018 (2) dt.23-05-2018

¶14

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Maranchi P.S. Case No. 22 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M–cum–Sub Judge- IV, Barh (Patna) subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C..

¶15

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶16

Sushma/Uma/U

Manish Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulab Choudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashok Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Most. Phula Devi @ Most. Phula Kunwar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rajeev Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Paswan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vikash Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.