Gulab Choudhary v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning an anticipatory bail application under Section 498A IPC, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer. The court noted that despite the wife being inclined to return, the petitioner refused to take her back within six years of marriage, leading to the rejection of the plea.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected in connection with Rohtas Complaint Case No.257 of 2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31752 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2016 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas
======================================================
Gulab Choudhary, Son of Parmeshwar Choudhary, Resident of VillageSatarbighava, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar.
- Dharamshila Devi, Wife of Gulab Choudhary, Daughter of Vikram Choudhary, Resident of Village- Satarbighawa, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas, present address at Village- Arang Tola, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail after refusing to take his wife back despite her inclination to return.
Whether the facts of reconciling with the wife and the duration of marriage are relevant to the grant of anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gulab Choudhary
- respondent
State of Bihar
- respondent
Dharamshila Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court