The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving land dispute-related offences including cheating. The petitioner agreed to furnish a bail bond.
Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32064 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2018 Thana -HILSA District- NALANDA
(BIHARSHARIFF)
====================================================== SHASHI KUMAR @ SHASHI KANT KUMAR, S/o Brijnandan Gope, R/o Vill.- Belwabag, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.129 of 2018, registered for offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 387, 354, 427 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a land dispute over certain areas of land which the informant claims. The dispute between the petitioner and the informant over the said piece of land has resulted in lodging of the present F.I.R. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is that he had pushed down the informant with bad intention
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32064 of 2018 (2) dt.11-06-2018
2
and was pulling her Saree. It is, however, submitted that such allegations have been purposely made to falsely implicate the petitioner solely because of the land dispute. The petitioner has got one case against him in which he has been on bail.
Learned APP for the State is present.
Considering the facts and circumstances particularly that the dispute between the parties is over a piece of land and in connection thereof it seems that the alleged occurrence has taken place, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.129 of 2018, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Arvind/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner charged with offences under various sections of IPC including 387.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shashi Kumar @ Shashi Kant Kumar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
