Allowed

Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jun 2018CR. MISC./32061/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition concerns a regular bail application. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased in a case involving Section 304(B), 420 and 506 IPC and Section 3/5 of the Prevention of Social Insecurity Act. The court granted bail conditioned on furnishing a bond with sureties and complying with relevant provisions of the CrPC.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bail bond and two sureties and complying with the conditions under Section 437(3) of the CrPC.

Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32061 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2018 Thana -DHANAHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

====================================================== Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandar Gupta, S/o Late Lal Pahari Gupta, R/o Vill.- Khalawapatti, P.S.- Dhanaha, District- West Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 11-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No.70 of 2018, registered for offences alleged under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner happens to be the father-in-law of the deceased and was living separately from his son. It is submitted that the husband of the deceased has already surrendered in connection with the present case. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 11.04.2018 as his name has been only involved because he happens to be the

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32061 of 2018 (2) dt.11-06-2018

¶10

¶11

father-in-law.

¶12

Learned APP for the State is present.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances that the petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and the husband has already surrendered in connection with the present case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1^st , Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No.70 of 2018, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶14

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶15

Arvind/-

¶16

U T

Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchandra Gupta @ Ramchandar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayvanti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Registration, Excise And Prohibi

Rajan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shashi Kumar @ Shashi Kant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhola Kumar Ram @ Bhola Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar