Petitioner sought modification of an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The High Court found no merit in the application for modification and dismissed it.
None. The modification application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27004 of 2018 (2) dt.09-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27004 of 2018
======================================================
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2/ 09-05-2018 This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 06.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc.5312 of 2018 in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.91 of 2016.
Prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail has already been rejected by this Court by order dated 06.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc.5312 of 2018.
This Court does not find any merit in this modification application.
Accordingly, this modification application is
dismissed.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
JA/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the modification application for anticipatory bail grant should be allowed in view of the rejection of the original prayer in Cr. Misc.5312 of 2018.
Dinesh Sah
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
