Subhash Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Patna considered a petition seeking extension of anticipatory bail. The petitioner had previously been granted bail with an undertaking to surrender but failed to do so even after extended time. The court rejected the petition to enlarge bail and rejected the request for further extension. While the order primarily discusses bail, it arises out of a complaint case involvingSectio
What did the court decide?
Petition for enlargement on anticipatory bail rejected; request for extension of period of surrender rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26055 of 2018
Arising Out of .Case No. -1541 Year- 2015 -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA
======================================================
- Subhash Rai, Son of Sri Lal Bihari Rai, Resident of Village- Hasanpura, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar.
- Vimal Kumar, Son of Shri Janki Sao, Resident of Village- Pario, P.O.Makhmilpur, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna, at present residing at Paliganj, P.S. and P.O.- Paliganj, District- Patna
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on anticipatory bail after failing to surrender within the stipulated extended time.
Whether the petitioner's readiness to return the amount justifies extending anticipatory bail despite non-compliance.
Whether the petition for extension of period of surrender should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subhash Rai
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Vimal Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court