Karun Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
What did the court decide?
Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25829 of 2018
Arising Out of .Case No. -1262 Year- 2015 -PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE District- PURNIA
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 03-05-2018 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint case No. 1262 of 2015 for the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner under Section 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant alleged that while she was keeping watch on her maize field the petitioner came and put her down on the ground with an intention to outrage her modesty but the complainant did not support this fact in her deposition on S.A. It is further submitted that Pradip Ram, husband of complainant, and Mahendra Sharma were examined and they disclosed that Tarun Yadav tried to outrage the modesty of the complainant. They did
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25829 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018
2/2
not disclose the name of petitioner. It is further submitted that prior to institution of this case Pradip Ram, husband of complainant, filed Labour case No. 619 on 11.09.2012 alleging therein that petitioner paid less amount of wages to Pradip Ram. The complainant on account of this dispute for non payment or less payment of wages filed this false case.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Complaint case No.1262 of 2015, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U T
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N/AReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karun Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sunita Devi
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court