The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 341, 342, 323, 498A, 34 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24568 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2017 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar S/o Baidyanath Rai, R/o Mohalla- Anisabad Post Office Gali, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Mistry For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 37(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim in drunken state.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2018. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24568 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 2/2
Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. case No.174 of 2017 and Special case No.799 of 2017.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner eligible for bail in offences under IPC Sections 341, 342, 323, 498A/34 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of BiharReferred¶16
Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, 2006(3) PLJR 182
7 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Reena Devi
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
