Allowed

Sudhir Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2018CR. MISC./23447/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the Patna High Court granted release to the petitioner who had been in custody since late December 2017. The case involved alleged dowry-related torture and other offences. The court considered a supplementary affidavit and permitted bail with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Sudhir Kumar Das Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23447 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2017 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhir Kumar Das Son of Nandipat Das@ Nandipati Das Resident of VillageBhahama, P.S. Pupri, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 24-04-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The same is kept on record.

¶16

In view of the supplementary affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 3 of the main application in course of the day.

¶17

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506, 494, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶18

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23447 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 2/2

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.12.2017. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 364 of 2017.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

Pankaj/-

¶25

U T

Sudhir Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Bharati Vs The State Of Bihar

Atul Chandra Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramji Sah @ Raji Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Naresh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar