Allowed

Ravi Shankar Bharati v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2018CR. MISC./23772/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an anticipatory bail application in a case involving IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act allegations, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions and furnishing sureties, distinguishing a cited precedent.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks, subject to bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of like amount.

Ravi Shankar Bharati Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23772 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Shankar Bharati, Son of Nandlal Ram, Resident of Village-Asoiyan, P.S.-Marhowrah, District-Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh (App) ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23772 of 2018(2) dt.23-04-2018 2/2

¶18

this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Saran Mahila P.S. Case No. 52 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

Ravi Shankar Bharati v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Shankar Bharati v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandramani Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Munsi Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Paras Bind and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinay Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Atul Chandra Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sudhir Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.