Allowed

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2018CR. MISC./24184/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to two petitioners already in custody in PS Case No. 335 of 2017 involving offences under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code related to dacoity and possession of a weapon.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari and Anr. Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24184 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2017 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari, S/o Md. Sahid Miya @ Md. Shahid Ansari,

¶5

Munna Ansari S/o Abdul Miya, Both r/o Vill.- Misrauli, Kharg Pokharia, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 24-04-2018

¶16

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶17

The petitioners, already in custody, seek bail in connection with Chanpatia P.S.Case No. 335 of 2017 registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian penal Code.

¶18

Allegation in brief is that on secret information, police raided the place and found the petitioners and others in intoxicating condition and recovered one loaded country made pistol from the possession of petitioner no. 2 and also some foreign liquor kept in the dickey of motorcycle.

¶19

Submission is that for the offense under the Arms Act and Excise Act, separate two cases were instituted. It is alleged that competitors were planning to commit dacoity, except suspicion raised, there is no other material and has had no such criminal

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24184 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 2/2

¶21

antecedents rather one case under Sections 307 and other allied offences of penal code and petitioner no. 2 prior to this case had no criminal antecedent of Arms Act and Excise Act and there is no recovery from petitioner no. 1 and both are in custody since 12.10.2017.

¶22

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners, namely , Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari and Munna Ansari are directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 335 of 2017.

¶23

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶24

sujit/-

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Neeraj Kuwar @ Niraj Kunwar Vs The State Of Bihar

Santawan Nut and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Das Vs The State Of Bihar