Allowed

Sudhir Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC23 Apr 2018CR. MISC./23810/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Sudhir Singh granted anticipatory bail to Sudhir Chaudhary in a case involving allegations of dowry harassment and torture. The petitioner must surrender within six weeks and furnish bonds of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of similar amount before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on surrender within six weeks by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount to CJM Jehanabad.

Sudhir Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23810 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2017 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhir Chaudhary, son of Naresh Chaudhary, resident of Village- Sattanpur, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Sangita Devi, wife of Sudhir Chaudhary, resident of Village- Sultanpur, P.S.Dhanarua, District- Patna, at present- R/v- Chanaura, P.S.- Kako, DistrictJehanabad.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Uday Pratap ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 23-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The victim is in the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23810 of 2018(2) dt.23-04-2018 2/2

¶17

habit of instituting cases for similar offence against the petitioner and his family members. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 60/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Sudhir Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandramani Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Munsi Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Paras Bind and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinay Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Bharati Vs The State Of Bihar

Atul Chandra Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.