Allowed

Vinay Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC18 Apr 2018CR. MISC./23360/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving allegations of torture and dowry demand, allowing him to be released on surrender within six weeks subject to bail bonds and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail to be released on surrender within six weeks on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Vinay Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23360 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1046 Year-2016 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinay Sah Son of Pramod Sah Resident of Village- Jalalpur Gangti, Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali, Presently residing at Mangolpuri, South Block House No. 1074, Plot No. 1200 Last, P.S. Mangolpuri, District- Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Suman Kumari Wife of Vinay Sah Resident of Village- Jalalpur Gangti, P.S. Mahua District Vaishali, Presently residing- daughter of Ram Babu Sah, Village- Rampur Singhana, P.S.Mahua, District- Vaishali.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 18-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23360 of 2018(2) dt.18-04-2018 2/2

¶16

petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. C11046/2016 (Trial No. 2589/2017), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Pankaj/-

¶21

U T

Vinay Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jairam Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua Vs The State Of Bihar

Dolly Devi and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chandramani Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Munsi Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Paras Bind and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar