Allowed

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Apr 2018CR. MISC./18968/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, this court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 regarding recovery of wine, requiring surrender within six weeks and furnishing bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in case No. 351 of 2017, subject to surrender within six weeks.

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18968 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2017 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua, Son of Late Baban Nonia, Resident of Village+P.S.+P.O.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur, at Bhabhua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rameshwar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 17-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a)/34/35/37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2 liters wine is recovered.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged motorcycle belongs to the petitioner. The said motorcycle was given to the co-villager by the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18968 of 2018(3) dt.17-04-2018 2/2

¶16

implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 2 liters wine is recovered from the motorcycle. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. case No.351 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Narendra/-

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Nonia @ Guddu Nainua v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Rai @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Jairam Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Dolly Devi and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Garibnath Chaudhary and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar