Allowed

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2018CR. MISC./22593/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge granted bail to the petitioner in ORCPSB2018 No.9 for offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, and 379/34, despite an allegation of criminal antecedents, subject to specific conditions and a bond of Rs.20,000.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation and non-suppression of facts.

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kuwar Vs The State Of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22593 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2018 Thana -BANMANKHI District- PURNIA

¶4

====================================================== 1. Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kuwar S/o Indeshwari Kuwar, R/o Vill.Makhnaha, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnea.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 23-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

According to FIR, three persons committed murderous assault against the son of the informant.

¶9

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2018 was registered on the statement of Komal Kumari, daughter of the petitioner wherein she alleged that while she was bathing, the son of the informant and others took her photographs and let it go viral and just to save the skin from that case, the present false case has been lodged which was news of the day vide copy of news paper attached as Annexure-5.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22593 of 2018 (2) dt.23-04-2018

¶11

2/2

¶12

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner has got a criminal antecedent.

¶13

The petitioner has countered this submission by submitting that in that case, the petitioner has already got acquittal.

¶14

Considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation and the background of allegation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Banmankhi Police Station Case No. 09 of 2018, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶15

If the petitioner would be found suppressing the criminal antecedent in the sense the referred case is still pending then the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner for suppression of material fact before the court.

¶16

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶17

Kundan/-

¶18

U T

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bacchi Devi @ Bachchi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Pandey and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Salam Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Dularchand Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Shambhu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jeetendra Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar