Allowed

Sharvan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2018CR. MISC./20830/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to Sharvan Kumar and Sonu Yadav in a prosecution under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of wine. The court released the petitioners subject to bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks, furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds each with two sureties.

Sharvan Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20830 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2018 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Sharvan Kumar, S/o Late Ram Lakahan Singh, R/o Vill.Babhandih, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya.

¶5

1. Sonu Yadav S/o Ashok Yadav, R/o Vill.- Yamunapur, P.S.Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 12-04-2018

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶11

The prosecution case, in short, is that 27 liters wine is recovered.

¶12

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused namely Manish Kumar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20830 of 2018(2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2

¶14

suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 27 liters wine is recovered from the Mango orchard. The mango orchard in question does not belong to the petitioners. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶15

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 81/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶18

Pankaj/-

¶19

U T

Sharvan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharvan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. K . Rajan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Soni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar

Bishundeo Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Murari Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Sah Vs The State Of Bihar