Allowed

Bishundeo Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 Apr 2018CR. MISC./20190/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Bishundeo Thakur, who was in custody since September 2017. The court ordered the petitioner to be released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in a complaint case alleging dowry-related cruelty under Section 498A IPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Bishundeo Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20190 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2003 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bishundeo Thakur, Son of Late Prasadi Thakur, Resident of VillageBaghandeo Tola, Mahkampur, P.S.-Barachatti, District-Gaya.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kiran Devi, Wife of Bishundeo Thakur, Resident of Village-Mahkampur, P.S.-Dobhi, District-Gaya.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 12-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.9.2017 has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20190 of 2018(2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2

¶18

the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Complaint case No.383 of 2003.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Narendra/-

¶23

U T

Bishundeo Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bishundeo Thakur v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. K . Rajan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Soni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar

Sharvan Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Murari Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Sah Vs The State Of Bihar