Allowed

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Apr 2018CR. MISC./20639/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving liquor seizure under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The bail was conditional upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, requiring a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail if arrested within six weeks, to furnish Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties under Crl.A.P. Act and CrPC Sec. 438(2).

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20639 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2017 Thana -GARKHA District- SARAN

¶4

====================================================== Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb, son of Bharat Singh, resident of VillageGarkha, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pranav Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶8

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 188 of the IPC and 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶9

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 25.92 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

¶10

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 25.92 liters wine is recovered from the Godown of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20639 of 2018 (2) dt.11-04-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the liquor kept in his Godown. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

¶14

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 6^th A.D.J./Special Judge, Excise Act, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

U.K./U T

¶17

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Singh @ Lal Saheb v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Manohar Sharma @ Tuntun @ Shyam Manohar Vs The State Of Bihar

Prakash Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Tanti Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Suresh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

R. K . Rajan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Soni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar