Allowed

Bablu Tanti v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC10 Apr 2018CR. MISC./20784/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case alleging cruelty and dowry demands. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within six weeks, furnish a bond, and be released subject to specific conditions under Section 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Bablu Tanti Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20784 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2017 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bablu Tanti S/o Mahendra Tanti, R/o Vill.- Parghari, P.S.- Sabour, DistrictBhagalpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Bharat Lal Mandal S/o Late Matuki Mandal, R/o Village- Sondih, P.S.Gouradih, District- Bhagalpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravina Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20784 of 2018(2) dt.10-04-2018 2/2

¶17

the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 181/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Bablu Tanti v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Tanti v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sanjeev Kumar Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rohan Kumar @ Chintu @ Ravi Kant Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shyam Manohar Sharma @ Tuntun @ Shyam Manohar Vs The State Of Bihar

Prakash Ram Vs The State Of Bihar