Allowed

Sanjeev Kumar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC9 Apr 2018CR. MISC./19012/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in an FIR under section 498A IPC, directing surrender within six weeks and furnishing bail bonds with sureties subject to procedural conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks, furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Sanjeev Kumar Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19012 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-324 Year-2016 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjeev Kumar Rai S/o Ram Babu Rai, R/o Village- Nirmali, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Smt. Puja W/o Sanjeev Kumar Rai, R/o Village- Nirmali , Ward No. 4 P.S. Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19012 of 2018(2) dt.09-04-2018 2/2

¶18

present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. V, Darbhanga in connection with C.R. No. 324 of 2016 (T.R. No. 1409 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Sanjeev Kumar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar Rai v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Ahilya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Chando Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Radha Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Riyajuddin Ansari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.