Allowed

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC9 Apr 2018CR. MISC./19636/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to Md. Khurshid Alam in a Section 498A case. The High Court directed that if the petitioner arrests or surrenders within six weeks, he shall be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, conditioned upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid Vs State Of Bihar and… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19636 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2123 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA

¶4

====================================================== Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid, S/O Md. Jamil Akhtar, R/V- Aurahi East, P.S. Simraha, District-Araria.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Heena Khatoon, D/O Abdul Qaium, W/O Md. Khurshid, R/VDahuwabari, P.S. Kursakanta, District-Araria.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App)

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 09-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

¶14

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶15

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19636 of 2018 (2) dt.09-04-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶19

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Araria, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2123C of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

U.K./U T

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Ahilya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Chando Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Radha Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Riyajuddin Ansari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.