In bail petitions under Section 273 IPC and Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act, the High Court enlarged the petitioners on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with specific conditions regarding surties and future conduct.
Petitioners to be enlarged on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19685 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2018 Thana- BAUSI District- Purnia
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Gulnar Begam, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioners seek bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the informantpolice personnel, is that on secret information, Maruti 800 vehicle of the petitioners was intercepted and from the vehicle 134.820 litres of foreign liquor was recovered. Petitioners were arrested on the spot.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are innocent, bear no criminal antecedent
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19685 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 2/3
and have been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that nothing has been recovered from their conscious possession and that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering with the prosecution witnesses by the petitioners.
However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.- III-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Purnia in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2018, subject to the conditions that:
(1) One of the bailors would be close relative of the petitioners having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioners.
(2) It is also made clear that if, in future, petitioners indulge in an offence of similar nature, the prosecution will
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19685 of 2018(2) dt.24-04-2018 3/3
be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of their bail
bonds.
(Nilu Agrawal, J.)
Arjun/Ragini
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be enlarged on bail in connection with offences under Section 273 IPC and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act, 2016.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh Mandal
Bablu Kumar
The State of Bihar
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
