Allowed

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2018CR. MISC./22546/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to two petitioners accused of robbery and snatch cases under Section 392 IPC. They were in judicial custody since February 2018. The court directed them to furnish bail bonds with sureties subject to cooperation in investigation.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj.

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain and Anr. Vs The State Of… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22546 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2018 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain, S/o Dil Mohammad,

¶5

Ansar Alam S/o Md. Alauddin, Both R/o Vill.- Dharamganj Muslim Basti P.S. + District- Kishanganj.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 19-04-2018

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 20.02.2018 in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 122 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that he along with his friend had gone to watch a movie and while he came out of cinema hall, four miscreants forcibly snatched his cycle, mobile and cash of Rs. 4030/- and fled away.

¶13

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are innocent, bear no criminal antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that they are not named in the First Information Report

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22546 of 2018(2) dt.19-04-2018 2/2

¶15

and their name surfaced only on the confessional statement of co-accused Quadir Perwez before the police, who had named the petitioners.

¶16

However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 122 of 2018, subject to the condition that petitioners will cooperate with the investigation/ trial and provide all necessary information, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of their bail bonds.

¶18

Arjun/-

¶19

U T

¶20

(Nilu Agrawal, J.)

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Bind Vs The State Of Bihar

Kaushal Singh @ Kaushal Kishore Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Amit Kumar Singh @ Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Arup Kumar Ghosh @ Arup Ghosh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ugo Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Premchand Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar