Allowed

Binay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2018CR. MISC./19282/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition by an accused person charged with carrying illicit liquor, the Patna High Court allowed bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties and conditions regarding investigation cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Special Excise Judge, Gaya.

Binay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19282 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2018 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA

¶3

====================================================== Binay Kumar S/o Pramod Yadav, R/o Village- Andhar, P.S.- Tankuppa, District- Gaya.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 24-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.03.2018 in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2018 for offences punishable under Section 30A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶11

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on secret information that some persons in a motorcycle are carrying illicit liquor from Jharkhand the police reached there and apprehended the petitioner along with two others. The police also found 5-6 persons walking in a suspicious condition and in their possession also illicit liquor was found. The petitioner was the driver of the motorcycle and from the co-

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19282 of 2018 (2) dt.24-04-2018

¶13

2/3

¶14

accused Pradeep Singh sitting behind, 40 liters of Mahua wine was recovered. Accordingly, a seizure list was prepared.

¶15

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal history, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and is languishing in judicial custody since more than 1 ½ months.

¶16

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer

¶17

for bail.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2018, subject to the conditions that:

¶19

(1) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶20

(2) Petitioner will co-operate in the investigation and provide all papers necessary during investigation and will

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19282 of 2018 (2) dt.24-04-2018

¶22

3/3

¶23

not tamper with the evidence failing which his bail bonds will be cancelled.

¶24

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶25

Devendra/-

¶26

U T

Binay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Vs The State Of Bihar

Nand Kishor Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Anshar Hussin @ Ansar Hussain and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar