This was a contempt application filed in connection with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6177 of 2016. The court held that the nature of the prior order dated 21.04.2016 did not constitute contempt.
Contempt application dismissed holding no contempt is made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4009 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6177 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Patna High Court MJC No.4009 of 2016 (2) dt.19-04-2017
2/2
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG15 Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
2 19-04-2017 Looking at the nature of the order, dated 21.04.2016, the Court is of the opinion that no contempt is made out.
Contempt application is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
SKM/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prior order attracts contempt proceedings and if no contempt is made out.
Rajeshwar Singh and others
The State of Bihar
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
