Oral order dismissing a contempt application, directing the petitioner to seek recourse of law for settlement of accounts, noting the court could not intervene further.
Contempt application dismissed; petitioner directed to seek other legal recourse for settlement of accounts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4087 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16129 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG-6 Pushkar Narain Shahi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
4 22-03-2017 Contempt application is now required to be dismissed.
Petitioner is free to take any other recourse of law or a forum for settlement of his accounts, which this Court cannot do beyond a point.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
SKM/-
U
Arun Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Deepak Kumar
Baidyanath Yadav
Akhilesh Kumar Jha
Shailesh Kumar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
