Oral order restoring a writ application (C.W.J.C. No. 18065 of 2016) to the original file due to lack of counsel representing Respondents Nos. 4 and 5, preventing timely service and defect removal.
Restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18065 of 2016 to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4082 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18065 of 2016
======================================================
Kuchari Devi Wife of Laxman Mallick resident of village Ahiwa Tola , Ward No.7, P.S- Raxaul, District Raxaul
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
3 22-03-2017 Since there is no counsel representing Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, who has been notified for the Patna High Court, which was the reason why the copy could not be served within the time fixed for removal of the defects.
In view of the same, the writ application, namely, C.
W. J. C. No. 18065 of 2016, is restored to its original file.
Restoration application is allowed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
SKM/-
U
Kuchari Devi
The State of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
