Allowed

M/s. Dhillon Freight Carriers, Through Its Authorized Representative Imran Khan v. The State Of Bihar Through The Excise Commissioner, Department Of Excise And Prohibition Department

Patna HC16 Mar 2017CR. WJC/242/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought directions to unseal its godown in Sitamarhi, sealed on 22.10.2016 for alleged liquor violations. The court allowed the application directing respondents to unseal and hand over the premises.

What did the court decide?

Directive to respondents to unseal and hand over the petitioner's godown to the petitioner at the earliest.

M/s. Dhillon Freight Carriers, Through Its Authorized… — Landlord and Tenant | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.242 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s. Dhillon Freight Carriers, Through Its Authorized Representative Imran Khan, son of Md. Mainuddin Khan, resident of K.G.N. Tower, Behind IGIMS, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna, Bihar.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through The Excise Commissioner, Department of Excise And Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate cum Adjudicating Authority, District Sitamarhi, Bihar.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, District Sitamarhi, Bihar.

¶10

The Officer in Charge cum Investigating Officer, P.S. Sitamarhi, District Sitamarhi, Bihar.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (Ga1)

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 16-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State-respondents.

¶15

The petitioner has sought for issuance of a direction upon the respondents to forthwith unseal and open the godown of the petitioner, which falls in the district of Sitamarhi and has been sealed on 22.10.2016 for alleged violation of the provision of Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016 for which Sitamarhi P. S. Case no. 674 of 2016 (G.R. no. 3338 of 2016) under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 47 of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016 has been registered.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.242 of 2017 (2) dt.16-03-2017

¶17

2/3

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the F.I.R., a few bottles of liquor were allegedly recovered from the godown of the petitioner which is used for the purpose of transportation of goods as the petitioner is carrying on business of carriers/transportations. Learned counsel has placed reliance of the order dated 06.10.2016 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Cr. W. J.C. No. 605 of 2016. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows :-

¶19

“ Learned counsel for the petitioner confines to the prayer made in this writ petition to unsealing residential premises of the petitioner, from where allegedly a few bottles of liquor were recovered less than one month after the notification was issued on 05.04.2016.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the various orders that have been passed in various cases, we direct that the premises of the petitioner be unsealed without prejudice to the State in respect of any other matter which would be disposed of in accordance with law.

¶21

With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of.”

¶22

Considering the order of the Division Bench above, it

¶23

is directed to the respondent-authorities that let the godown of the

¶24

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.242 of 2017 (2) dt.16-03-2017

¶25

3/3

¶26

petitioner, as stated above, be unsealed and handed over to the petitioner at the earliest.

¶27

With the aforesaid observation this application stands allowed.

¶28

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶29

sudip/-

¶30

U T

M/s. Dhillon Freight Carriers, Through Its Authorized Representative Imran Khan v. The State Of Bihar Through The Excise Commissioner, Department Of Excise And Prohibition Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Dhillon Freight Carriers, Through Its Authorized Representative Imran Khan v. The State Of Bihar Through The Excise Commissioner, Department Of Excise And Prohibition Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Investigation Bureau

Pradip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shatrughan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhash Kumar Yadav @ Prabhash Yadav @ Prabhash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikram Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapildeo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar