The High Court granted bail to two petitioners charged with offences under Sections 363/366A/120B/34 IPC in a case involving the abduction and forced marriage of minor girls, directing them to furnish a bond and sureties.
Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2616 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2016 Thana -BISHUNPUR District- DARBHANGA
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 15-03-2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners are languishing in custody in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No.86 of 2016 for offences punishable under Sections 363/366A/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Two minor daughters of the informant namely, Nisha Kumari, aged about eleven years, and Saloni Kumari, aged about five years, were found missing. Thereafter F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. On recovery of both the girls, the statement of Nisha Kumari was recorded, under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she stated that she had voluntarily left her house. However, on the next day co-accused Anil Yadav forcibly
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2616 of 2017 (3) dt.15-03-2017
2/2
took her in a temple and married with her. Thereafter both lived at different places including at Delhi. She has not alleged anything against the petitioners.
Considering the facts aforesaid, let petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2016.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners languishing in custody in connection with abetting to disobedience of any order of a court and abduction and cheating offences can be enlarged on bail.
Whether the alleged offence of trafficking for the purpose of forced marriage affects the grant of bail to the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shatrughan Yadav
Amol Yadav
State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
