Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC22 Aug 2017CR. MISC./5501/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a police complaint case at Katihar. The petitioner and his wife expressed willingness to live together, and the court ordered release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail pending arrest/surrender by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Santosh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Arbitration | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5501 of 2017 (12) dt.22-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5501 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -420 Year- 2014 Thana -KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKATIHAR

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Santosh Kumar, Son of Late Ram Iqbal Prasad, Resident of VillageDarubatti Chauk, Gayatri Mandir, near Mestro Hospital, P.O. + P.S. Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga, at present Resident of Mohalla- Rahat Road, Karim Chauk, P.O. + P.S. Town Thana, District- Chapra.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Shanta Devi, Wife of Santosh Kumar, D/o Late Gaya Prasad Sah, Resident of Mohall- Larkaniya Tola, P.O + P.S. + District- Katihar.

¶10

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submitted that the petitioner and the opposite party no.2, who are husband and wife, are ready to continue their conjugal life.

¶15

12 22-08-2017

¶16

Petitioner and opposite party No. 2 and the brother of the opposite party no. 2 are also present. Petitioner and opposite party no. 2 has no complain against each other and they also desire to live together.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5501 of 2017 (12) dt.22-08-2017

¶19

within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Katihar, (Bihar), in connection with Complaint Case No. 420 of 2014 subject to condition as laid down under 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶21

veena/-

¶22

U T

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujit Kumar Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sundar Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chunchun Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Idbi Bank Ltd. Having Its Corporate at Cufe Prade, Wtc Complex and Anr. Vs The Union Of India Through Labour Secretary, Govt. Of India and Ors.

Nagendra Kumar @ Nagendra Das and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar