Allowed

Krishna Sah and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2017CR. MISC./24625/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the mother-in-law of a deceased who was charged with dowry death under IPC 304(B). The court held that anticipatory bail was not infructuous despite the petitioner-husband's surrender in a different cognate matter.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties within six weeks.

Krishna Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24625 of 2017 (4) dt.19-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24625 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -THAWE District- GOPALGANJ

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Krishna Sah, Son of Dukhi Sah.

¶6

Ram Sakhi Devi, Wife of Krishna Sah, both are Resident of VillageUdant Rai Ke Bangra, P.S. Thawe, District- Gopalganj.

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhramveer

¶10

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akshay Lal Pandit

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 19-08-2017 Since the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1 has already been dismissed as infructuous due to his surrender vide order dated 06.07.2017.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner no. 2 apprehends her arrest in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017, registered under Sections 304(B)/34 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The accusation is that informant, Kamal Kunwar, perform the marriage of her daughter with Prabhunath Sah before three years. Thereafter, Prabhunath Sah used to demand of dowry but the informant was not able to fulfill the same due to that

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24625 of 2017 (4) dt.19-08-2017

¶17

reason the daughter of the informant was killed by her husband and in-laws and her dead body was disposed of.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is married Nanad and petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased, daughter of the informant, and she has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that it would appear from the F.I.R. that the demand of cash was made by Prabhunath Sah, son of petitioner

¶19

no. 2.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶22

Bhardwaj/-

¶23

U T

Krishna Sah and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Sah and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrika Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Afajal Hussain @ Afjal Hussain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jhagru Prasad @ Jhagru Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sujit Kumar Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Sundar Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Murli Sah Swarnkar @ Murli Sah Vs The State Of Bihar