Allowed

Sujit Kumar Sao v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2017CR. MISC./24188/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving allegations of duplicate material preparation and intellectual property infringement, directing surrender before the lower court within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to be surrendered before the Court below within six weeks.

Sujit Kumar Sao Vs The State Of Bihar — Intellectual Property | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24188 of 2017 (3) dt.19-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24188 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2017 Thana -GIRIYAK District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)

¶4

====================================================== Sujit Kumar Sao, son of Shivdani Sao, resident of Village- Sarmera, P.S.Sarmera, District- Nalanda, at present H/o Madan Lal Sao, resident of Village- Mangarbigha, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017, registered under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471 and 486 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 103 and 104 of the Indian Trade Mark Act and Sections 63 and 65 of the Copy Right Act.

¶13

The accusation is that informant, Kumar Daya Shankar, employee of Do Pont India Private Limited, came to know that at village Mangarbigha, P.S.- Giriyak, District Nalanda, in the house of petitioner, duplicate materials are being prepared in the name of Do Pont India Private Limited. Thereafter, he informed to the police on 12.04.2017 and reached at the village

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24188 of 2017 (3) dt.19-08-2017

¶15

Mangarbigha along with police officials, where a person who present there, disclosed that Sujit Kumar (petitioner) used to reside in the house of Madan Lal Kumar, in which, duplicate company’s packet sticker and other materials of Do Pont Inida Pvt. Ltd. and some empty container were recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, petitioner used to reside at the rented house of Madan Lal Kumar for doing the job of labourer and at the time of search, petitioner was not present there but he has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif, in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶19

Bhardwaj/-

¶20

U T

Sujit Kumar Sao v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar Sao v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrika Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Afajal Hussain @ Afjal Hussain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jhagru Prasad @ Jhagru Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Krishna Sah and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sundar Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Murli Sah Swarnkar @ Murli Sah Vs The State Of Bihar