Dismissed

Jhunjhun Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC10 Jul 2017CR. MISC./54397/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed petitioner's appeal against rejection of remission application. Court found no illegality in Sessions Judge's charging of offences under Sections 323, 308 and 504 IPC for trial as case challenging inherent jurisdiction was rejected.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed; petitioner at liberty to raise defence in trial court.

Jhunjhun Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54397 of 2013 dt.10-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54397 of 2013

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2011 Thana -SARAI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶5

===========================================================

¶6

Jhunjhun Kumar, S/O Subodh Kumar, Resident of Village- Phulwaria, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali.

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Sanjay Kumar, S/O Radha Kant Singh, Resident of Village- Dharampur, P.S.Sarai, District- Vaishali.

¶11

.... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, advocate. Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.

¶12

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s :Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP

¶13

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶14

Date: 10-07-2017

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶16

learned counsel for the State.

¶17

2. This application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the order dated 31.08.2013 passed in Sessions Case No. 423 of 2012, whereby the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-V, Vaishali at Hajipur, rejected the application dated 24.04.2013 of the accused-petitioner to remit the case to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, as on perusal of the materials available in the case diary and injury report, offence under 308 of the Indian Penal Code, which is exclusively triable by the court

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54397 of 2013 dt.10-07-2017

¶19

of Sessions, is not made out. It appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Vaishali at Hajipur on perusal of the materials available in the case diary and the injury report arrived at conclusion that there is sufficient material to frame the charge under Sections 323, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and rejected the application dated 24.04.2013 of the petitioner.

¶20

3. On going through the impugned order, I find no illegality in the impugned order amounting to abuse of the process of the court for interference in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his defence/points in trial court at the appropriate stage.

¶22

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶23

Bhardwaj/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
UploadingDate	12.07.2017
Transmission Date	12.07.2017

Jhunjhun Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jhunjhun Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parash Singh @ Parash Awadhiya Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeshwar Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ambika Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arbind Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kamal Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.