Dismissed

Ambika Prasad v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC10 Jul 2017CR. MISC./52007/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the framing of charges in a trial court involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 504 IPC, the court found no illegality warranting interference in its extraordinary jurisdiction and dismissed the application.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed; petitioner allowed to raise points at appropriate stage in trial court.

Ambika Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52007 of 2013

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -340 Year- 2011 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR

¶4

=========================================================== Ambika Prasad, Son of Late Basawan Ram, Resident of Mohallah - Old Pani Tanki, Dharhara, P.S. Ara ( Town ), District - Bhojpur ( Ara ) ( Bihar ).

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. 2. Sachchidanand Pandey, Son of Akhileshwar Pandit, Resident of Village - Dhanupura, P.S. Ara Town, District – Bhojpur, at Present Jawaharlal Residential School, near Hindustan Gas Godown, Dhanupura, Police Station - Ara Town, District - Bhojpur at Ara ( Bihar ).

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶11

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-07-2017

¶12

Heard.

¶13

2. This application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the order dated 11.09.2013 passed in Trial No.6013 of 2010, arising out of Ara Nawada P.S. Case No.340 of 2011, whereby the court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ara, framed the charge for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused-petitioner.

¶14

3. On going through the impugned order, I find no illegality therein amounting to an abuse of the process of the court for interference with the same in an extraordinary jurisdiction of this

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52007 of 2013 dt.10-07-2017 2/2

¶16

Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his points, as raised herein, at the appropriate stage in the trial court.

¶18

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶19

P.S./-

¶20

U T

Ambika Prasad v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambika Prasad v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parash Singh @ Parash Awadhiya Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeshwar Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jhunjhun Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arbind Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kamal Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.