Mukul Tripathi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for nonprosecution as the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52385 of 2017 (02) dt.08-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52385 of 2017
====================================================== Mukul Tripathi & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajballabh Singh-A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 02 08-11-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent while learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Vikash/U T
Vikash/-
Mukul Tripathi & Ors
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court