Disposed

Md. Neyaz and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./50050/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail matters, the single judge held that petitioner no.2, with criminal antecedents, must surrender for regular bail, while petitioner no.1, free of antecedents, could be released on a bail bond within four weeks of arrest/surrender. The case is disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner no.2 must surrender for regular bail. Petitioner no.1 granted bail on bond of Rs.10,000 on surrender within four weeks.

Md. Neyaz and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50050 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -103 Year- 2016 Thana -MARKAHI District- KHAGARIA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Neyaz, S/o Abdul Rub,

¶5

Md. Naushad S/o Late Fajal Karim, Both are R/o Village- Marar, P.S.Morkahi, District- Khagaria.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶8

State.

¶9

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No.103 of 2016 registered under Sections 188, 153(A) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Allegation is that all accused persons were raising slogan against the other community creating communal tension.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation that what slogan was raised by the petitioners causing hurt to religious feelings to other side. Moreover eight other named co-accused were admitted to anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.46492 of 2017 on 22.09.2017.

¶12

Since petitioner no.2 has got criminal antecedents,

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50050 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017

¶14

2 /2

¶15

therefore, his prayer of bail stands rejected in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No.103 of 2016, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria. However, petitioner no.2 may surrender and seek regular bail.

¶16

As far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, since he has got no criminal antecedent, let petitioner no.1, namely, Md. Neyaz in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No.103 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶17

The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶18

(Arun Kumar, J.)

¶19

S.Kumar/-

¶20

U T

Md. Neyaz and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Neyaz and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Dipanjan Dutta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Amit Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Chintu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar