Allowed

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. MISC./39010/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 17-10-2017, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Manoj Kumar, a Zila Parishad Chairman, apprehending arrest in an IPC case involving rape, cheating, and criminal intimidation under Sections 376, 420, and 506 IPC.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to CrPC Section 438(2) conditions.

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39010 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2016 Thana -MEDANICHOWK District- LAKHISARAI

¶3

====================================================== Manoj Kumar, son of Newalal Mahto, resident of village- Abgil, Rampur, P.S.- Medanichowki, District- Lakhisarai.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhakar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶6

State.

¶7

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Medanichowki P. S. Case No. 6 of 2016 instituted under Sections 376, 420 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The allegation in brief is that informant, after being deserted by her husband, was sexually exploited by the petitioner on the pretext of getting married.

¶9

It is submitted that the informant is a married lady and her marriage was solemnized in the year 1995 and there is no material to show that she was raped by the petitioner rather due to political vendetta, by setting up this lady, has been falsely implicated in this case as the petitioner is Chairman of Zila Parishad, Lakhisarai.

¶10

Having considered the aforesaid facts and

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39010 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Manoj Kumar, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Mednichowaki P.S.Case No. 6 of 2016; subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶14

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶15

Sujit/-

¶16

U T

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Dipanjan Dutta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Amit Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Neyaz and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chintu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar