The Patna High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an FIR. The court held that since the petitioner used different photographs and impersonated another person during the physical test, an offence was disclosed.
The application for quashing of the FIR stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43790 of 2014 (3) dt.16-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43790 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -777 Year- 2013 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA
====================================================== Amit Kumar Mishra Son of Ghanshyam Mishra Resident of VillageDariyapur, P.S.-Sajor, District-Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bijoy Kant Mishra For the Opposite Party : Mr. B.N. Pandey (App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 16-10-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.
The allegation is that the petitioner being applicant
for the post of Constable used two photographs and another person impersonated him at the time of physical test including running. So it is not a case that no offence is disclosed.
Accordingly, this application for quashing FIR stands dismissed.
(Arun Kumar, J.)
Snkumar/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed given that the petitioner impersonated himself during the physical test.
Whether any offence is disclosed against the petitioner in the alleged act of impersonation.
Amit Kumar Mishra
The State of Bihar
Arun Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
