Oral order in a criminal miscellaneous petition regarding bail. The court rejected the petitioner's prayer for bail citing the nature of recovery of antique idols and the petitioner's criminal antecedents.
Prayer for bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49612 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49612 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2016 Thana -ASHTHWAN District- NALANDA
(BIHARSHARIFF)
====================================================== 1. Subodh Kumar Son of Muneshwar Ravidas, resident of VillageDumrawan (Tetua Bigha), P.S. Asthawan, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 17-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP.
Considering the nature of recovery of antique idols coupled with criminal antecedents of the petitioner as incorporated under para-3 of the instant petition, prayer for bail is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be admitted considering the nature of recovery of antique idols coupled with criminal antecedents of the petitioner.
Subodh Kumar
The State of Bihar
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
