Single judge order rejecting a bail prayer in a matrimonial murder case involving dowry demand and torture leading to the death of the petitioner's wife.
Prayer for bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49217 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2016 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR)
======================================================
Bigau Ram son of Sri Harihar Ram, Resident of Village- Kripalpur, P.S.Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
Deceased Mamta was married with the petitioner about three years ago. There happens to be categorical statement of the informant regarding demand of dowry as well as torture meted out to the deceased which lastly cost her life. From the order impugned, it is evident that whole event materialized in a bed room and that has been found, perceived by the I.O. during course of objective finding of the P.O.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49217 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017
2
Prayer for bail is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail raised in the case should be allowed in light of the allegations.
Bigau Ram
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
