Allowed

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2017CR. MISC./46170/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, Santosh Kumar, who was in custody since June 21, 2017, in a case involving cheating, forgery, and theft of a motorcycle.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Darbhanga.

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy Vs The State… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46170 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2017 Thana -JALE District- DARBHANGA

¶3

====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Roy @ Santosh Roy, S/o Ritlal Roy, Resident of Village- Madhubani, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in Jalley P.S. Case No. 95 of 2017 registered under Sections 401, 411, 413, 414, 419, 420 and 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The stolen motorcycle is said to have been recovered and seized from the possession of the petitioner which is said to have been purchased by him from Sunil Kumar.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the said motorcycle was purchased by him from Sunil Kumar bonafidely believing him to be the owner of the said motorcycle on his assurance that he will get his name transferred in the owner book soon. He had no knowledge of the aforesaid motorcycle to

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46170 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017

¶10

2/2

¶11

be stolen. He has got no criminal antecedent. He has been languishing in custody since 21.06.2017.

¶12

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Darbhanga in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 95 of 2017. Learned lower court is directed to accept

¶13

the bail bond of the petitioner on verification of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner .

¶14

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶15

Mishra/-

¶16

U T

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabir Kumar @ Kabir Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Jadu Nandan Ray Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar