Allowed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2017CR. MISC./46096/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving kidnapping of a minor. The court relied on the victim's statement and the Magistrate's finding that she was major and had voluntarily married the petitioner to direct bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate.

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46096 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2017 Thana -HAZIPUR INDUSTRIAL DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Son of Suresh Prasad Singh @ Suresh Rai, resident of Village- Sahdullahpur, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶4

02 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶5

The petitioner seeks bail in Industrial Area (Hajipur) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2007 registered under Section 363, 364 & 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

As per the prosecution case, petitioner is said to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant enticing her.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. had herself stated that he has performed marriage with the petitioner out of her sweet will and the learned Magistrate has assessed the age of the victim as 18 years. Thus, the victim is major. The learned Magistrate at the instance of the father of the petitioner ordered to release the victim finding her major. The

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46096 of 2017 (02) dt.20-09-2017

¶9

2/ 2

¶10

petitioner has been languishing in custody since 21.06.2017.

¶11

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Industrial Area (Hajipur) P.S. Case No.31 of 2017.

¶12

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶13

Trivedi/-

¶14

U T

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bahadur Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kabir Kumar @ Kabir Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar