Allowed

Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Sept 2017CR. MISC./45890/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail was allowed to the petitioner in connection with an offence punishable under Section 392 IPC involving snatch theft at gunpoint. The court noted the petitioner was not named in the FIR, no incriminating articles were recovered from his possession, and the only incriminating evidence was the oral confession of a co-accused. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the C.J.M., Gopalganj.

Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45890 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ

¶3

====================================================== Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav S/o Raghunandan Yadav, resident of VillageSultanpur, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the State.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case no. 36 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Three motorcycles borne criminals are said to have snatched the motorcycle, mobile, cash and other belongings of the informant on the point of gun.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that neither the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor any incriminating article was recovered from his conscious physical possession. There is nothing on record indicating his complicity in the occurrence barring the confessional statement of co-accused

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45890 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

¶10

2/2

¶11

Golu Mishra which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.07.2017.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017.

¶13

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶14

rohit/-

¶15

U T

Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paltu Yadav @ Satish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binay Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Branch Manager National Insura Vs Kitaban Khatoon and Ors.

Parmeshwar Yadav and Anr. Vs the United India Insurance Com

Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bahadur Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Das Vs The State Of Bihar